The real shift: from “which channel?” to “how does demand actually form now?”
Look at those headlines and you see three loud signals:
- Search is fragmenting and becoming less reliable (publishers expecting 40% drops, SEO no longer a single discipline, Google AI overviews, consent controls).
- Social is increasingly the front door to discovery (social-first ranking, social-to-search halo, Reddit SEO, short-form video, Bluesky, influencers).
- AI is now part of the funnel itself, not just a productivity toy (AI funnel adaptation, generative engine optimization, semantic tricks to win AI citations, personalized AI tools).
Underneath all the noise is one issue that actually matters to operators:
Your demand path is now social → AI → search → site, not search → site.
If your media, measurement, and creative still assume “search and site” are the main battlefield, you’re quietly ceding growth to brands that design for this new path.
The new demand path: social → AI → search → site
Let’s strip this down to how people actually behave in 2026.
1. Social: where the idea starts
Headlines about:
- Short-form video performance
- Reddit SEO strategies
- Social-first ranking strategies
- Family influencers and “authentic partnerships”
…all point to the same thing: the first touch is increasingly social discovery, not a query box.
People see:
- A TikTok review
- A Reddit thread
- An influencer’s “day in the life”
- A creator’s comparison video
That’s where the idea to consider a category or brand forms.
2. AI: where the options are framed
Generative engine optimization, semantic tweaks to increase AI citations by 642%, and “personalizing AI for a business” are not academic topics. They’re about this moment:
After seeing something on social, people now ask:
- “Best running shoes for flat feet?” into ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity.
- “Is [Brand] worth it?” into an AI assistant.
- “Compare [Brand A] vs [Brand B] for [use case].”
AI doesn’t just answer; it frames the choice set. If you’re not in the frame, your performance media is subsidizing someone else’s sale.
3. Search: where intent hardens
Search isn’t dead, but it’s different:
- Publishers expect >40% drops in traffic.
- SEO is now “no longer a single discipline.”
- Social content drives branded search (the “social-to-search halo”).
By the time people hit Google, they often search:
- “[Brand] discount code”
- “[Brand] reviews”
- “[Brand] vs [Competitor]”
Search is now more about validation and deal-hunting than discovery.
4. Site: where you either convert or waste all of the above
Moz’s 37% lift in inquiries from conversion strategy and Copyhackers’ “73% of your ecommerce emails are broken” both point to the same operational truth:
If your site and CRM don’t match the story that social and AI have been telling, your funnel is leaking from the bottom.
Why this matters for operators: your current funnel map is lying to you
Most dashboards still show a neat, linear story:
Impression → click → session → conversion.
That’s not how demand is forming. The real path looks more like:
Social impression → AI query → branded search → competitor comparison → creator review → AI summary → coupon site → your PDP → TikTok search → your FAQ → purchase.
If you optimize only for last-click ROAS or channel silo performance, you:
- Over-fund bottom-funnel search and retargeting that just harvests demand created elsewhere.
- Under-fund social and creator content that actually drives branded search and AI mentions.
- Ignore AI surfaces that are quietly rewriting your category’s “truth.”
Designing for the new funnel: 5 moves for CMOs and performance leaders
1. Treat social as your “query generator,” not just a cheap reach channel
The “social-to-search halo” is measurable and operational, not a fluffy brand story.
What to do:
-
Instrument for branded search lift, not just direct ROAS.
- Run geo-split tests: heavy paid social + creator in test markets vs. control.
- Measure incremental branded search volume and CTR in test vs. control.
- Assign a portion of branded search value back to social in your MMM or incrementality model.
-
Design creatives to seed specific queries.
- Use hooks that literally teach people what to search: “Search ‘[Brand] mattress trial’ before you buy anything else.”
- Highlight category terms you want associated with your brand: “quiet blender for 6am smoothies” becomes a search phrase.
-
Exploit Reddit and niche communities as intent factories.
- Use Reddit SEO tactics not just to rank, but to shape the language people use when they later search or ask AI.
- Plant detailed, honest comparisons and use cases that AI systems can ingest as training signals.
2. Treat AI surfaces as a new class of “meta-affiliate”
Generative engines are like the world’s biggest affiliate partners: they don’t care who you are; they care what they can confidently recommend.
What to do:
-
Audit how AI currently describes you.
- Systematically query: “Best [category] for [segment/use case]?” across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and others.
- Log: Are you mentioned? How are your claims and pricing described? Which sources are cited?
-
Feed the machines structured, consistent facts.
- Standardize product specs, pricing, and differentiators across your site, retailer pages, PR, and knowledge bases.
- Use schema markup and FAQ content that directly answers the queries you tested.
- Ensure third-party review sites and key publishers have accurate, up-to-date info; AI loves them.
-
Build “AI-ready” content, not just SEO content.
- Create comparison pages and buying guides that read like answers an AI would give: clear trade-offs, scenarios, and recommendations.
- Use simple, consistent phrasing; semantic clarity is now a performance lever, not a nice-to-have.
3. Rebuild search strategy around branded intent and category defense
With AI and social doing more discovery, search should be managed like a profit center for harvesting and defending intent, not just buying every expensive keyword on Ahrefs’ list.
What to do:
-
Segment search into three jobs:
- Brand defense: own your name, misspellings, and “[Brand] + review / discount / complaints.”
- Category validation: “[Category] reviews,” “[Category] vs [Category],” “best [category] 2026.”
- Competitor interception: competitor + “alternative,” “vs,” “switch from [competitor].”
-
Stop overpaying for generic discovery terms you no longer own.
- Use incrementality testing on high-cost generic terms (the “100 most expensive keywords” type) and cut where cannibalization is high.
- Redeploy that budget into social and creator programs that drive branded search and AI inclusion.
-
Align landing pages with the story users already heard.
- If social and AI positioned you as “the quiet blender for early risers,” your search landing page should open with that exact promise, not generic brand copy.
4. Make your site and CRM match the expectations set upstream
Moz’s 37% lift from conversion strategy and Copyhackers’ email findings are symptoms of the same disease: the message breaks between channels.
What to do:
-
Map “promise vs. proof” across the funnel.
- List the top 10 claims your social, influencers, and AI results make about you.
- For each claim, identify where on your site that promise is clearly proven (or not).
- Patch the gaps with specific sections, FAQs, and social proof that mirror the language users have already seen.
-
Fix the invisible breaks in email and CRM.
- Audit triggered flows: do they reflect the entry point? Someone coming from Reddit vs. a coupon site should not get the same first 3 emails.
- Use simple behavioral tags: “saw comparison,” “came from creator,” “searched discount” and adjust messaging hierarchy accordingly.
-
Use AI inside the funnel, not just to write copy.
- Deploy simple AI-driven on-site helpers that answer the exact questions you saw in AI and search audits.
- Train these helpers on your best-performing support answers and sales scripts, not just your FAQ page.
5. Change how you measure: from channel ROAS to “demand design” performance
As long as your reporting stack worships last-click ROAS and siloed CPA, your budget will drift back to the wrong places.
What to do:
-
Introduce a simple “demand creation vs. demand capture” split.
- Label channels and campaigns as primarily “create” (social, influencer, some video, top-funnel AI content) or “capture” (search, retargeting, affiliate, coupon).
- Set different performance expectations and time horizons for each bucket.
-
Track second-order effects, not just direct conversions.
- Monitor branded search volume, AI mentions, and direct traffic as key success metrics for “create” activity.
- Use MMM or at least geo experiments to quantify the lift and protect those budgets in planning cycles.
-
Incorporate the “shakeout effect” into CLV modeling.
- Expect more early churn from AI- and social-driven first purchases; they’re sampling more brands faster.
- Model CLV with a steeper early drop-off and focus retention efforts on the surviving cohort, not the average.
What this means for your next planning cycle
If you’re a CMO, performance lead, or media buyer, the question is no longer “What’s our TikTok strategy?” or “How do we rank in AI overviews?”
The real question is: “How does demand actually form for us now, and are we designing for that path end-to-end?”
Practically, that means:
- Rewriting your funnel map around social → AI → search → site.
- Funding social and creator work as query generators, not vanity reach.
- Treating AI engines as a new distribution layer you can influence with facts and structure.
- Turning search into a defense and validation machine, not a blunt discovery hammer.
- Making your site and CRM feel like the inevitable next step in a story that started somewhere else.
- Changing your measurement language from “channels” to “demand creation vs. capture.”
The brands that win the next few years won’t be the ones that “do more AI” or “go all in on social.” They’ll be the ones that accept a simple, uncomfortable reality: the funnel you’re optimizing is not the funnel your customers are actually using.